Why should we back?
Intro
Cladist aims to deliver a pair of gloves built for serious protection: designed to resist cuts, needle punctures, and general hazards — while still remaining wearable for everyday use. They target people who handle sharp objects, do hands-on work, or simply want a high-level protective glove that doesn’t sacrifice dexterity. In a world where safety and practicality matter, Cladist presents itself as a next-generation tool for both professionals and everyday users.
Why should I back this project?
-
Top-tier protection: The gloves are rated at A7 (ANSI) / F (EN 388) cut resistance, with additional needle and puncture resistance — a level of defense well beyond standard work gloves.
-
Comfort and flexibility: Despite the heavy-duty build, Cladist uses a specialized composite structure aiming to deliver protection without bulk, allowing for good hand mobility and grip.
-
Practical for many settings: Whether you’re working with tools, handling sharp materials, or just need reliable protection for daily tasks — the glove’s features (anti-slip palm, touchscreen compatibility, reinforced fingertips) make it versatile.
-
Strong demand and support: The project has already surpassed funding goals by a large margin, indicating solid interest and a greater chance of full production.
What are the potential drawbacks you should consider when you back it?
-
Protection isn’t absolute: Even high-resistance gloves can’t guarantee 100% safety from every blade or needle — heavy or serrated tools may still pose risks.
-
Possible trade-off between safety and comfort: Although designed for flexibility, added protective layers might still feel stiffer or less comfortable than standard gloves, especially during prolonged wear.
-
Higher cost than ordinary gloves: Given the advanced materials and protective specs, the price is likely above average — may be overkill for casual users or light tasks.
-
Dependence on correct fit and care: For maximum safety and longevity, the gloves likely need proper sizing and maintenance; misuse or wear may degrade protective performance over time.
The reliability of the project
-
Clear technical specifications: The campaign lists concrete performance standards for cut resistance, puncture resistance, and additional features — giving backers clarity about what they’re pledging for.
-
Experienced design background: The creators claim experience in safety equipment, materials science, and industrial design — suggesting they understand the balance between protection and usability.
-
Strong funding and community support: The campaign’s funding significantly exceeds its goal, indicating both trust and real demand — which improves the likelihood of reaching production and maintaining quality.
-
Meaningful real-world use cases: For users working with sharp tools, glass, metal, or in hazardous environments, gloves like Cladist fill a real safety niche — which adds to their practical credibility.
Conclusion
Cladist gloves offer compelling protective value — blending high-level cut and puncture resistance with flexibility and everyday usability. If you often handle sharp tools, work in potentially hazardous environments, or simply want reliable hand protection for daily tasks, backing Cladist seems like a well-grounded decision. That said, for casual or light tasks, the level of protection and higher cost may be more than necessary. For anyone prioritizing safety and durability over minimalism, Cladist stands out as a strong, thoughtful choice.
